Planet of the Apes is a Crusade Against God

planet-of-the-apes-1968

There are a lot of movies that tell us to disobey God, or insist that He doesn’t exist.  Most of them are implicit, simply showing us how a sinful behavior is actually beneficial, or pushing the idea that all authority or authority figures are corrupt.  Some movies, however, get more bold.  Some of them take the subject of God and religion head-on, screaming with tenacity of its evil.  Planet of the Apes is such a film.

But before getting into the analytical details, let’s take a look at the setting of the film itself.  Planet of the Apes was released in 1968 and stars Charlton Heston, an astronaut who, along with fellow Americans, lands in the distant future on what they think is Earth, until they find humans acting like animals, and a society of sentient apes controlling them as the intelligent species of this new mysterious place.  Taylor’s (Heston) companions are all killed in a man hunt by the apes, while he is captured and taken back to the Apes’ home.

Having a damaged throat at first, Taylor has no way of communicating to the Apes that he can speak.  Over time, he manages to communicate this to the zoologist, Zira.  When he finally is able to speak, she believes him, and claims that he could be proof of the supposedly crackpot theories of her fiance Cornelius.  Cornelius believes that the sacred writings of their religion are inadequate to explain their origins, and instead believes that they evolved from humans into apes.

Starting to sound familiar yet?

But Dr. Zaius, who holds a position of authority both as a cranky theologian and as a scientist, isn’t so sympathetic.  He believes that Taylor is an animal who holds no rights, and deserves to be put down.  He also has no tolerance for the theories of Cornelius, even as evidence for his theories continue to rise up throughout the film, particularly at its conclusion.  So instead of appealing to reason, after seeing the brutal condemning tribunal and the brutality and arrogance of the enforcers of the status quo, Taylor and his ape friends decide that, to do the right thing, they have to rebel against the authority figures that are in place.

pota3

 

The particularly remarkable thing in this story is that Taylor doesn’t really want to stay and change things in that society.  He just wants to be free to go his own way.  But the monarchs of this dystopian ape society aren’t content to let him leave.  They are insistent that they must have dominion over him, or else they are not content.

There’s so much here, it’s hard to even know where to begin.

Let’s start with Cornelius.  The guy is a revolutionary scientist who believes that apes evolved from men.  Obviously, Cornelius is meant to represent Charles Darwin, as well as evolutionary science as a whole.  The entire narrative is really about evolution versus God.  Even if you wanted to argue that evolution and Christianity are not mutually exclusive (which they are), the film makes it clear that, in its world, that is the case.  Religion has kept Cornelius from presenting his reasonable theories.  Religion has kept him from giving a sentient being basic rights.  Religion has impeded progress.

planet-of-the-apes

Part of me wants to launch into a narrative about how science doesn’t disprove God, and how science overwhelmingly gives evidence for a creator.  But this isn’t a science blog.  And part of me suspects I’d be preaching to the choir.  So instead, I’m linking to some helpful books on this topic in the Amazon links at the bottom of the page, and continuing a discussion of the film.

Despite the film’s rather generous depiction of evolution, the true problem in the film’s worldview lies elsewhere.  It lies in the depiction of religion, and the religious.  According to these filmmakers, religion is inherently closed-minded, oppressive, and intellectually dishonest.  Dr. Zaius even destroys evidence of Cornelius’s theories!

Then, there’s the plot’s conclusion.  The only way to combat the evils of religion is to rebel against it, violently, if necessary.  The religious can’t be reasoned with.  They can’t see outside of their pitiful little worlds.  They are not misunderstood friends.  They are enemies.

That’s what this film is saying.  That’s what it’s about.  The religious are enemies to reason, foes to progress.  So as this franchise ever expands, with the eighth film coming in July, we have to take our stand on it.  The story is built on an anti-Christian foundation, so why should Christians tolerate it?

Logan Judy
Logan Judy is a Christian blogger and science fiction author with a Batman complex. At Cross Culture, Logan writes about film, comics, cultural analysis, and whatever else strikes his fancy. In addition to his work at Cross Culture, Logan also blogs and podcasts at A Clear Lens. You can find him tweeting about Batman, apologetics, and why llamas will one day rule the world, @loganrjudy.
Logan Judy on Twitter

2 thoughts on “Planet of the Apes is a Crusade Against God

  1. Ok, here are my thoughts on your article (I am a Christian as well).

    First of all I agree that science proves god more than ever.

    However, I think you misunderstood the film. First off, the film did not promote evolution. Cornelius suggested that Taylor was a missing link between man and ape. Taylor obviously wasn’t and corrected him right away. What they have to prove in the end is that man was there and in charge before apes. Not evolution. They are still the same chimps orangutans and gorillas, just walking and talking. Real apes walk on two legs half of the time, and can sometimes say syllables. There’s nothing anti bible on that.

    And here’s the real shocker………………………………………Wait for it……………………….Wait for ittttttttttttt………….Dr Zaius was actually right! Yes, you read that correctly. Zaius is right. Let me explain-Zaiuses motive throughout the film is to basically get rid of Taylor. Why? Because he believed men are destroyers, and “harbingers of death”. Hmmmmm… let’s see-Humans turned America into the forbidden zone with nuclear weapons. That sounds right. They blew up the symbol of freedom, the Statue of Liberty. Who do you think Taylor is asking God to damm to hell? The people who destroyed their own country of course!

    Dr Zaius is trying to protect his culture. And he’s right for doing so. After all, Taylor destroyed the world in the sequel. Yep. Zaius was right to try to stop Taylor from being at liberty. Man is dangerous. Desperate times call for desperate measures. That poor old orangutan. (And for the record, the lawgiver was real [appears in Battle for the planet of the apes])

    I hope I have made you understand this film more clearly. Because this is a fun movie (the Tim Burton remake is great too, but that’s a different discussion) that can be watched with a good conscience. Plus I believe different films are different for different Christians. One film might influence one Christian to sin, but not even affect another. For me, I just love talking monkeys and spaceships.

    Please reply!!
    I would like to hear what you have to say about my response!

    -Cade

  2. You complain that the foundation of the films are supposedly that “The religious can’t be reasoned with. They can’t see outside of their pitiful little worlds. They are not misunderstood friends. They are enemies.”

    And conclude by asking: ” The story is built on an anti-Christian foundation, so why should Christians tolerate it?”

    Doesn’t that rather prove the point you complain about?

    Though, as well as misrepresenting many Christians, you ignore the fact that at the very end of the first film Cornelius approvingly quotes from the Sacred Scrolls on their depiction of “the beast, Man.”
    The point of the films has actually been about intolerance manifested in any form – be it racism or religious bigotry or social caste – and in the recent reboot series, the desire of some humans to play at being God. The apes’ rise and humanity’s collapse is depicted as the result of genetic experimentation gone wrong, something I’d have thought many Christians would strongly agree with.

    On the other hand, maybe you should just go and enjoy them as good sci fi fun.

Leave a Reply